January 30, 2023
NDTV News


Babloo Saifi, Abdul Samad’s son, spoke to NDTV.

Hours after a case was filed in Uttar Pradesh’s Ghaziabad towards Twitter and eight others, together with journalists and Congress leaders,  over posts linked to an aged Muslim man’s assault that allegedly “provoked communal sentiments”, a brand new twist has emerged within the controversy. The household of Abdul Samad, the aged man who was attacked, has denied police’s claims that he sells amulets.

Abdul Samad had alleged he was pressured to chant “Jai Sri Ram” and “Vande Matram” and his beard was reduce off by the accused when he was taken to a forested space and locked up in a room on June 5. The UP Police, nonetheless, denied any “communal angle” within the case, including that he was crushed up over the amulets he offered to some males.

He was attacked by six males – Hindus and Muslims – and he knew them, police stated. Journalists Rana Ayyub, Saba Naqvi, and Congress leaders Salman Nizami, Shama Mohamed and Maskoor Usmani are amongst those that have been accused of sharing “misleading” posts – linked to the incident – that have been re-tweeted by hundreds of individuals, in response to an FIR filed towards them. Twitter has been accused of taking no motion over the posts.

His son, nonetheless, has refuted the police’s claims. “The police is wrong is saying that my father used to sell ‘tabeez’ (amulets). No one in our family does this business. We are carpenters. The police are not saying the right thing – let them investigate and prove it,” Babloo Saifi, Abdul’s son, informed NDTV.

He additional stated: “We filed a FIR at the Loni police station on June 6. A cop told us – ‘Chacha’ what is the big deal if your beard got cut off. A friend who went with my father got angry and told the cop the beard is sacred for many Muslims.”

Elaborating the sequence of occasions, as defined by his father earlier, Babloo Saifi stated that on the day of the incident, Abdul Samad was taken forcefully to a abandoned place after he took an auto. “The men took my father to a deserted place. Then he was beaten up and his beard was cut off. But my father’s live was saved. He was tortured for four hours,” he claimed.

Three folks have been arrested to this point within the assault case. “When we investigated this case, we found that he (Abdul) came on June 5 from Loni border area. From there, Abdul Samad, who makes amulets, went to Hazipur village. He already knew the accused. The men, who were upset with him over the amulets, had called him,” Ghaziabad police officer Iraj Raja is heard saying in an official video assertion.

The FIR towards Twitter and eight others has been filed underneath IPC sections 153 (provocation for rioting), 153A (selling enmity between completely different teams), 295A (acts supposed to outrage non secular emotions), 505 (mischief), 120B (prison conspiracy) and 34 (widespread intention) towards them.

Journalist Rana Ayyub tweeted this afternoon: “I shall wait for the truth to prevail at the earliest.

This is the first case against Twitter after government’s new rules for online news publishers came into effect; sources in the government have said Twitter can face liability for third party content. Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad in series of tweets today said “what occurred in UP was illustrative of Twitter’s arbitrariness in combating pretend information”. 

“While Twitter has been over keen about its truth checking mechanism, it is failure to behave in a number of circumstances like UP is perplexing and signifies its inconsistency in combating misinformation,” he added.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *