The Supreme Court says it will not instantly intervene with a Delhi High Court order granting bail to student-activists Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita and Asif Iqbal Tanha who’re accused within the Delhi riots case. The Supreme Court says this case might have pan-India ramifications because of the means the UAPA has been interpreted. So, ought to the Delhi High Court order which was seen as defending the fitting to dissent be allowed to stay?
